![]() ![]() This is common for all of our clients who are victims of actively traded child pornography, regardless of how long ago the image was created. ‘Any distribution of or profits earned from any sexually explicit image of a child not only creates longstanding liability but it also breeds lifelong trauma. ‘Child pornography is a forever crime,’ Marsh Law told Variety in a statement last year. READ MORE: Krist Novoselic on Nevermind’s impact. However, his lawyers have argued that the statute of limitations does not apply, as long as Nevermind continues to be sold in its current form. A judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Nirvana that was filed by the man who was photographed as a baby for the classic album’s cover art. Regardless of the merits of Elden's case, they argued that Elden’s claims were too late as the statute of limitations had expired in 2011. tattooed across his chest he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay and he has used the connection to try to pick up women.’ They also added that Elden ‘has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times he has had the album title. Lawyers for the defending group said: ‘Elden's claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is “child pornography” is, on its face, not serious,’ noting that anyone who owned a copy of the record would ‘on Elden's theory guilty of felony possession of child pornography’. Judge Fernando M Olguin therefore dismissed the case ‘with leave to amend’ - meaning his team have until 13 January to refile the case with appropriate changes. Lawyers for the group said that until recently Elden had seemed to enjoy the notoriety of being the ‘Nirvana baby’Įlden's team had until 30 December to respond to Nirvana's motion to dismiss, but missed the deadline.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |